What Is Ryan’s Rule, And What Are the Equivalents Across Australia & New Zealand?

When people talk about Ryan’s Rule, they mean a patient/family-initiated escalation process in Queensland hospitals: if a patient in hospital is getting worse or not improving, loved ones can trigger a clinical review. It’s a critical safety net.

But what about other states in Australia, and what about New Zealand?

Here’s how each region handles similar escalation pathways.

Why these rules exist...

First, a quick reality check: Health services across Australia and New Zealand are required to have recognition & response systems for patient deterioration.

These systems typically include:

  • Clinical criteria (vital signs, mental state changes) for escalating care
  • Mechanisms for staff to call for help (e.g., rapid response teams)
  • Importantly, a way for patients, carers or family members to trigger escalation when they are worried.

These escalation-of-care protocols are built into the National Safety and Quality Health Service (NSQHS) Standards, Standard 8 (“Recognising and Responding to Acute Deterioration”).

Why these systems matter...

  1. Patient & Family Empowerment: They recognise that family or carers often pick up on subtle deterioration before clinical metrics do.
  2. Safety Net: Formal escalation reduces risk by triggering review before things become critical.
  3. Consumer Partnership: These systems reflect a partnership model – patients / carers are not just passive recipients of care but active safety partners.
  4. Quality Assurance: They help hospitals meet national safety standards and promote accountability.

 State-by-State in Australia: What Are the Equivalents of Ryan’s Rule?

  • For some states (e.g., South Australia, Northern Territory, Tasmania), there is less publicly available, state-wide branded escalation process data. But under NSQHS Standard 8, all hospitals must still have such protocols.
  • Some escalation processes may be local to individual hospitals rather than a single “state program.”

Here’s a breakdown of how patient/family escalation works:

  • QLD

  • NSW

  • ACT

  • WA

  • vIC

  • sA

  • nT

  • TAS

  • NEW ZEALAND

  • PRIVATE HOSPITALS

Why These Escalation Systems Matter

  1. Empowerment of Patients & Families: These systems recognise that family or carers often notice subtle changes earlier than clinicians.
  2. Safety Net: By institutionalising a formal escalation pathway, hospitals can catch deterioration earlier and reduce risk.
  3. System Accountability: Having a phone number or process means a structured review is more likely; it’s not just informal complaining.
  4. Standards Compliance: These escalation procedures help hospitals meet national safety and quality standards (in Australia) or national guidance (in NZ).
These systems are all part of a broader goal: making sure that when patients (or their loved ones) feel something is wrong, their voice is heard, and prompt clinical action follows.

Challenges & Notes to Be Aware Of

  • Awareness Gap: Not all patients / family members know these escalation systems exist. Even in jurisdictions where there is a named “rule,” awareness varies.
  • Variation in Implementation: Some hospitals may not clearly promote the escalation number or process, leading to underuse.
  • Response Quality: The effectiveness of escalation depends on the hospital’s response capacity (senior staff availability, rapid response teams).
  • Private vs Public: Many of these escalation systems are established in public hospitals; private hospitals may have their own (e.g., Ramsay Health Care’s “RAISE the Ramsay Rule”). Ramsay Health Care
  • Data & Evaluation: Some systems (like Ryan’s Rule) have been evaluated in studies: one study found that many activations ended with communication alone resolving the concern, rather than major clinical intervention. PubMed

If you love any of the articles on our site we would you love you to share them to help raise awareness.

Medical Disclaimer

The information and support services provided by Australia and New Zealand Forum for AutoInflammatory Diseases Limited (hereafter known as ANZFAID), are intended for general information and peer support purposes only. ANZFAID is a not-for-profit organisation and does not provide medical, diagnostic, or therapeutic advice or treatment.

Nothing on our website, in our publications, at our events, or in any of our communications should be taken as medical advice, nor is it intended to replace consultation with a qualified healthcare professional. Always seek the guidance of your doctor or another qualified health professional with any questions you may have regarding your health or a medical condition.

ANZFAID does not endorse or recommend any specific healthcare provider, treatment, medication, or service. Information shared through our organisation—whether by staff, volunteers, or community members—should not be considered a substitute for professional medical advice.

Use of our services and materials is at your own discretion and risk. While we aim to provide accurate and supportive information, ANZFAID accepts no liability for any loss or damage suffered as a result of reliance on information provided.

All materials contained within this website are subject to copyright and MUST NOT be copied or shared unless in their entirety and with relevant links in place to direct back to the original source on this website.